Advertising Technology

Blocked ads certainly aren’t viewable, are they?

Fraud, viewability and trust are big issues for the online ad industry right now. There's a lot of overlap. Fraudulent impressions aren't viewable (because they're “seen” by bots), and this erodes trust in the relationship between buying and selling.

There's another part of the trust mission — the users. You know, the ones advertisers want to see their ads. There seems to be eroding trust on the user-side, as is apparent from the continued growth of ad-blocking software.

This is why so many are working toward improving viewability and trust, while also trying to squash fraud.

Also on the trust topic, publishers are apparently quite wary of Facebook's direct-publishing play. Obviously.

  • Publishers arm for war with ad blockers (Digiday) – Publishers aren't being passive in the fight, however. Advertising is how they pay to have their content produced, and some pubs are saying if you're not going to take part in their advertising game then you can't take part in their content either.
  • In The Quest For 100% Viewability, Everyone Takes A Different Path (AdExchanger) – Here's a breakdown of the pitfalls faced in terms of the journey toward 100% ad viewability. One thing to ad: the third-party viewability tech providers that aren't standardized can hurt. If the buy- and sell-sides are using different vendors, it can lead to discrepancies and then nobody wins in the this-vs.-that which follows.

By |February 20th, 2015|Advertising Technology|0 Comments

Technorati emerges as leader in inventory quality after venture with Forensiq

Technorati, an advertising technology company focused on accelerating publishers programmatic revenues, has partnered with Forensiq, a leading advertising technology company that fights ad fraud, to provide a safe environment for buyers and sellers to transact programmatically with minimal risk of fraud. This successful partnership has helped Technorati achieve industry recognition from the IAB and Pixalate as a leader in quality assurance and seller trust.

In the programmatic landscape where nearly 40 percent of impressions are served to bots, ad fraud is costing advertiser billions in misspent campaign dollars. Technorati has long focused on combating the rise of fraudulent traffic and creating a network that truly benefits both advertisers and publishers.

As a result of these efforts, Technorati earned a spot among the top 25 on Pixalate's Global Seller Trust Index. The index rates companies based on various qualitative analyses to bring trust, transparency, and success to the programmatic marketplace.

“Maintaining network quality is paramount because Technorati holds a crucial role for programmatic publishers,” Technorati CEO Shani Higgins said. “Being transparent and creating trust in the system takes a major step in ensuring those on both sides of the equation know they can transact with confidence. We take our role in the effort to improve the value of digital advertising very seriously.”

Technorati partnered with Forensiq over the summer to further the mission of ensuring that only quality impressions were being served. Through this partnership, Technorati built on its commitment to quality by blocking additional suspicious publishers and millions of impressions in order to ensure that only the highest quality of the inventory was under its management.

“While we did forgo some revenue in the short term by removing all sources of non-human traffic from the network, in the long run our ability to monetize the quality inventory on our network has greatly improved,” Technorati Sr. Director of Network Operations Chris Hallenbeck said. “Forensiq's tools helped us improve the value and performance of our inventory, thereby increasing advertiser demand and quality publisher retention.”

Working with Forensiq and improving the quality of inventory has been one of the contributing factors to growing overall metrics for Technorati. Comparing average CPMs across the Technorati network year over year, Technorati saw an increase of 37% across average Q4 2014 CPMs vs. the prior year.

Showing the commitment to invest in the quality of the inventory helps buyers be more comfortable with the inventory they are placing their ads on when buying through that platform.
“Assuring high quality, fraud-free inventory is a virtuous cycle,” said Dean Harris, CMO for Forensiq. “To borrow a concept from Economics, better quality inventory will perform better and those better performing sites will get more digital investment at a higher CPM because they are trusted and work more effectively.”

Technorati's focus on quality has also resulted in becoming one of the introductory organizations to achieve the IAB Quality Assurance Guidelines, which has a goal of providing transparency to advertisers as well as defining a framework for industry-wide sell-side disclosures to ensure buyers are enabled to make informed decisions.

About Technorati
Technorati is a company of advertising technology specialists working toward rewarding the creators of great content. To accomplish this, Technorati builds tools and services that accelerates publishers' programmatic revenues as well as makes partnering in programmatic easier and more effective for publishers. Technorati is headquartered in San Francisco.

About Forensiq
Forensiq is a fast growing company that has developed and implemented a series of effective solutions to help fight online ad fraud from impressions to clicks to conversions. The firm combines the latest technology plus a dedicated staff of fraud fighters who are obsessed with helping clients stay steps ahead of the bad actors and achieve a better ROI. Forensiq is headquartered in New York City with offices in London and San Francisco. The company won 3 LeadsCouncil LEADER Awards in 2015 plus the Leads Council LEADER Award for Best-In-Class for Fraud Detection in 2014. To learn more, visit http://www.forensiq.com

By |February 17th, 2015|Advertising Technology|0 Comments

Peering through the window at an evolving programmatic landscape

An industry that's evolving comes with it many other evolutions as well — how we think and talk about things, how solve new problems, how we solve old problems, and how sometimes it's preferred to just stick to what you do best. Here's a roundup of headlines from this week that covers changing terminology and strategies and a company changing its strategy and focus. There's also a bit on what we can learn from windows (the real ones, not the OS).

  • The New Premium: How Programmatic Changes The Way Advertisers Value Inventory (AdExchanger) – As any industry grows and evolves, so does its terminology. In terms of the online advertising industry, one of those evolving terms is “premium inventory.” Previously tied to channel and content type, the term is more often being used in reference to the audience sitting in front of those impressions.
  • How Rampant is Online Ad Fraud? (Wall Street Journal) – comScore released data this week that indicates a majority (but not all) of the online fraud is tied to the bottom 20 percent of ad campaigns. This would seem to support the theory of fraud being at least somewhat avoidable if you work with the right partners.
  • SAY Media Unloads Its Websites to Focus on Tech (AdWeek) – Being a publisher isn't easy. Being a tech company isn't easy. Being both is proving to be pretty impossible. Focus on what you want to do, and work with trusted partners for the rest.

By |February 6th, 2015|Advertising Technology|0 Comments

During viewability growing pains, let’s agree to agree

The Wall Street Journal this week posted a pretty exhaustive roundup of the pain we're all going through as the battle for ad viewability wears on.

In its CMO Today blog, the WSJ does an excellent job outlining the background of viewability, what's broken about it and what needs to be done to fix it.

What's also interesting about this writeup is the hinting at the kinds of conversations those on both sides of the table are having during this period of growing pains. It can be pretty much summed up by this quote:

It's a “total cluster.” … That was among the softer comments.

Do publishers want to be able to track and guarantee ad viewability to 100 percent? Absolutely. Do advertisers want 100 percent viewable ads? Obviously.

I'd also like to fly from California to New York in three hours, and I'll maybe be able to one day. But not today.

Advertisers stamping their feet and demanding 100 percent viewability now isn't helping. Likewise, publishers throwing up their arms and saying “we can't” isn't helping either.

What this issue boils down to is that there needs to be an agreement between seller and buyer to transact business based on the current technological capabilities of the system while still pushing the tech forward.

The technology that will one day enable 100 percent viewability is in development, but it isn't ready yet. Until then, each side has to agree on ways to do business now and ways that the business should be done in the future — agree on a path.

It should be comforting to know that technologies that are put to use are more often than not improved. So, use the accredited viewable display vendors and establish ways to resolve inconsistencies in reporting. Use them, and they will push forward to improve their accuracy and efficacy.

—

READ MORE: The Push For Web Ad Viewability Proving To Be Nightmare For Publishers Early On

By |January 27th, 2015|Advertising Technology|0 Comments

Cleaning up some placements and maxing out others

Keeping it simple, it would seem that weeding out fraud is as easy as working with those you trust. Speaking of fraud, it's apparently staring publishers right in the face when it comes to fishy-looking desktop traffic. When it comes to maximizing end-of-article placements, publishers have options. Maybe it's time to put the mobile app vs. mobile web debate to bed, and taking a difference-angle look at cookies.

  • Fixing online advertising: How to beat bots, scammers … and the invisibility problem (VentureBeat) – In a guest column in Venture Beat, Martini Media CEO Erik Pavelka tackled the issues of ad fraud and viewability. For viewability, we might be a way off. In terms of fraud, the points outlined by Pavelka, while somewhat oversimplified, are on target in that in order for buyers to reach a quality audience, they must work with trusted sellers.
  • In defense of the cookie (AdExchanger) – Lou Montulli, co-founder and chief scientist at Zetta.net, offers an interesting look back at the history of the cookie, and explains why he still thinks the cookie was the way to go in the early days of online banner ads.

By |January 24th, 2015|Advertising Technology|0 Comments